Re: Editor Priorities
Previously Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I'll ask the opposite question - why give priority to them, just because
> they happen to support multi-languages? I thing there are several more
> important aspects to an editor than that.
I would love to see your reaction if you suddenly get a default editor
that is only capable of editing Japanese. I'm sure you will suddenly
change your opinion.
> So on the one hand, there are easy ways to do so, but it takes years to do
> it? That seems like a *damn* good reason to do it, from my point of view as
> a volunteer software developer. You did it because it matters to you. I
> don't do it because it takes years to do. Somehow I'm a racist for not
> volunteering my time for years of work?
WTF has race got to do with it? I'm severly disappointed someone would
even suggest that.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: