Re: xg (Re: virtual package (x-)editor ?)

To: Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@spin.ch>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: xg (Re: virtual package (x-)editor ?)
From: karlheg@hegbloom.net (Karl M. Hegbloom)
Date: 24 Nov 2001 17:44:13 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87oflr39qq.fsf@bittersweet.intra.hegbloom.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87u1vj3b86.fsf@bittersweet.intra.hegbloom.net>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.40.0111250053570.5508-100000@tpo2.sourcepole> <[🔎] 87u1vj3b86.fsf@bittersweet.intra.hegbloom.net>

 If anyone just grabbed that; between 17:12 -0800 and 17:43 -0800,
 please get it again.  I just fixed a few errors.
-- 
I was Linux when Linux wasn't cool.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: virtual package (x-)editor ?
  - From: Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@spin.ch>
- xg (Re: virtual package (x-)editor ?)
  - From: karlheg@hegbloom.net (Karl M. Hegbloom)

Prev by Date: Re: Debian GNU/w32, may ready to be started?
Next by Date: Re: [logcheck] I hear you...
Previous by thread: xg (Re: virtual package (x-)editor ?)
Next by thread: Re: xg (Re: virtual package (x-)editor ?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread