Re: LILO
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:09:10PM +0100, Frederico Mu?oz wrote:
> Ummm... ina all this I was trying to found a reason for LILO to be the
> default bootloader... every reason
> I could see appears to be invalid, but there is probably a big one out
> there that I'm missing utterly...
Tradition, and the fact lilo will boot over software RAID, SCSI drives with
no BIOS, etc? (OTOH, GRUB *does* netboot and multiboot). The reason is this:
* GRUB provides few drivers
* GRUB reads the config file and the kernel off the partition, at
boot time
So, if GRUB doesn't have a driver for <foo> BIOS-less SCSI card (and it
won't), you won't be able to boot off it. Ditto software RAID, you can't
boot from that, because GRUB doesn't support md/LVM support, if you want
that you'll have to use LILO, because it writes the entire boot sector, etc,
from inside Linux.
Personally, I prefer GRUB, but I can see why LILO is used in some
circumstances.
d
PS, the documentation (or lack thereof) for GRUB was absolutely awful when I
last checked, has it gotten any better?
--
Daniel Stone
daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LILO
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>
- References:
- LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Robert van der Meulen <rvdm@cistron.nl>
- Re: LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Roland Bauerschmidt <rb@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>