On 01-01-17 Peter Novodvorsky wrote: > ++ 17/01/01 08:42 +0100 - Christian Kurz: > > On 01-01-17 Peter Novodvorsky wrote: > > > I think you misuderstood me. I wanted to say that we already have > > > group (not one developer) that maintains packages. Junichi said that > > > > No, you misunderstood me. We have the QA Team, which currently takes > > care. But this is not the right Team to take care of orphaned packages. > > Orphaned packages should be maintainer by a seperate team, so that QA > > can focus more on other important tasks. (And I know that this team > > consits of more people, see my signature. ;) > Do you mean that not only sponsored packages, but also orphaned > packages should be maintainet by sponsor team? No, once again. I think that sponsored packages should be maintainer by a sponsor team and orphaned packages by an orphaned team ;). This way the QA Team can focus again on it's QA task. If you have any more question, the let discuss them via the other way. ;) Ciao Christian -- Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Team Member 1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
Attachment:
pgpFrYfnOndJH.pgp
Description: PGP signature