On 01-01-16 Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
> ++ 16/01/01 21:33 +0900 - Junichi Uekawa:
> > In Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:16:09 +0300 Peter Novodvorsky <nidd@debian.org> cum veritate scripsit :
> >
> > > Next idea is that committee is shareing one incoming queue. People
> > > doesn't need to seek for sponsors. They just upload their packages to
> > > SDB upload queue. Any comments?
> >
> > I think this obfuscates who is responsible for sponsoring the package
> > too much.
> We have QA. It is responsible for orphaned packages. Does it obfuscate
> who is responsible for sponsoring the package? Anyway, we can register
> who uploaded the package last time.
QA already has enough open tasks that are done by the QA Team, so adding
another task like sponsoring people is in my opinion not acceptable. And
I would normally say that the maintainership of the orphaned packages
isn't also a task for a QA Team, but more a task for a separate Team.
The QA Team does focus more on having our packages in a good shape and
be bugfree, taking care of maintainers that are MIA and so on. So there
are enough tasks that the QA Team is already taking care of. I would
vote for creating then a new Sponsors Team, that consists of sponsor,
who will take care of this packages.
Ciao
Christian
--
Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Team Member
1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
Attachment:
pgpuQTT_SDhK4.pgp
Description: PGP signature