Re: XEmacs, TeX, and Re: Lengthy Debian install procedures
David Welton writes:
> Well, most commercial unixes don't seem to have much of anything useful
> from the start (or at least that is what my little experience has lead me
> to believe), but, from my experience, I have seen that most of them end
> up with certain tools, thus they are 'standard'.
They end up with emacs because someone installs it. On Debian, that is
trivial.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Reply to:
- References:
- Lengthy Debian install procedures
- From: Ben Armstrong <synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca>
- XEmacs, TeX, and Re: Lengthy Debian install procedures
- From: Steve Dunham <dunham@cse.msu.edu>
- Re: XEmacs, TeX, and Re: Lengthy Debian install procedures
- From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
- Re: XEmacs, TeX, and Re: Lengthy Debian install procedures
- Re: XEmacs, TeX, and Re: Lengthy Debian install procedures
- From: David Welton <davidw@gate.cks.com>
- Re: XEmacs, TeX, and Re: Lengthy Debian install procedures
- Re: XEmacs, TeX, and Re: Lengthy Debian install procedures
- From: David Welton <davidw@gate.cks.com>