Re: User-contrib, up-to-date stable
On Thu, Oct 23, 1997 at 11:50:41AM +0300, Fabrizio Polacco wrote:
> I think that if we continue to talk about some kind of "stable-update",
> we will only get negative reactions.
>
> What we need here is, IMHO, an "unstable-for-libc5". Not a complete
> distribution, but simply a repository for packages from unstable
> recompiled (by official debian maintainers) and packaged using libc5
> that is in stable (that is to say compiled on a stable system).
But is this worth the trouble given that it's only an issue for this
particular upgrade? How soon is 2.0 expected anyway?
hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust hamish@debian.org, hmoffatt@mail.com
Student, computer science & computer systems engineering. 3rd year, RMIT.
http://hamish.home.ml.org/ (PGP key here) CPOM: [***** ] 57%
The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. --Bohr
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: