Re: dpkg and custom kernels ( was: report of upgrade bo -> hamm )
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I know, none of the reasons by themselves are good enough, but
> together they are enough for me to seek approval from the
> developers. Are there any objections to Joost's proposal? Will I be
> lynched if I made epochs the default? What epoch do I choose? (5
> seems a nice, round, prime number)
Isn't kernel-package used to build the debian kernal image packages? I don't
think making epochs default is a good idea.
--
see shy jo
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: