Re: dpkg and custom kernels ( was: report of upgrade bo -> hamm )
On 22 Oct 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> The reason, I think, that dpkg upgrades the custom kernel with
> a new standard kernel is that the new standard kernel comes with an
> epoch; hence making it preferable in dpkg's eyes over _all_ non
> epoched versions.
>
> The solution, for the future, is to put an defensive epoch on
> the custom kernel (kernel-package allows you to do so:
> --revision 1:custom.Y); however, the solution is admitedly ugly. I
> wish there had been no epochs on standard kernels ;-), however, since
> each new kernel version is a new package, at least the epoch won't be
> carried around for ever.
Could you make the epoch a standard feature of kernel-package?
If /etc/kernel-pkg.conf gets a switch that sets the default epoch level,
then the maintainer of the distribution kernel-{source,image}s can
configure his kernel-package to use an epoch that is always lower than the
one that is used by default, thus keeping dselect from wanting to
"upgrade".
Cheers,
Joost
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: