Re: [UPLOADED] Re: RFS: Adopted Package: pathogen

[Barry deFreese <bddebian@comcast.net>]

Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded pathogen.  Thanks.
>
>   
Rock on, thanks.

> <snip>
> > I'm not quite sure what "compatible" license it is..  
> >     
>
> Compatible?  With what?  That's a word usually used with GPL licensed
> stuff.  There isn't anything GPL in there, right?
>
>   
Well I guess I was looking at stuff like "BSD-like" and such.  I've just 
put it as "other" for now with the text of the license.

> <snip>
> As I wrote, I think this is a very good package to use the
> machine-readable format, to make sure that it is clear which message
> belongs to which files.
>
> You need to add license information for your packaging work; if you
> choose to use the same license as the package, it's different from the
> rest of the packaging, which is only assumed to be under the same
> license.  I'd use something like this:
>
> <snip>
> I'm not sure if this is the proper way to add different licenses to the
> same files, but it seems good to me.  You may want to check the wiki if
> it says anything about this.
>
>   
> > > Thanks,
> > >       
> > No, THANK YOU. :)
> >     
>
> No, I insist; thank _you_. ;-)
>
> Bas
>
>   
OK, another version of xlife is up on mentors for your kind review..

Thanks again,

Barry deFreese