Re: Perl 5.005 in potato

[Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>]

Mike Stone said:
> I'm still convinced that the reason slink's freeze took so long is that
> some major packages were uploaded just prior to it, because they
> "needed" to be in. Just like people want to do with perl...

There is a difference in this case: freeze is not in effect, and not
immenent. If it were, Mike'd have a valid argument: perl-5.005 is -not-
being snuck in under deadline, because deadline does not presently exist.

I'd love to see perl-5.005 in, personally.

-Jim