Re: Intent to package xmemos
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 04:03:20PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> No. The current version has had a _clarification_ added, but is
> still very much GPLed (without additional clauses). See the
> Debian package or http://www.lyx.org/license.html
>
> In any case, there's a bug reported againsr xwatch but none
> against lyx. See my point?
Then there should be a bug against lyx... based on what I know.
> BTW, I'm happy to seek a license change, I just object to BTS
> harassment and declaration like `XWatch should not be in there'.
I can understand some of that sentiment, but please don't look on the BTS
as harassment. It's supposed to be used for passing situations (like this)
to maintainers of packages...
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html <gecko@benham.net> <>< *
* -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------*
* Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster *
* <gecko@debian.org> <secretary@debian.org> <webmaster@debian.org> *
* <lintian-maint@debian.org> *
=========================================================================
Reply to: