EGCS Re: glibc 2.1 notes
"Marcelo E. Magallon" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 08:47:24AM -0800, Joel Klecker wrote:
>
> > * lintian's "compiled-with-bad-libc" tag trips on anything linked
> > with glibc 2.1, but under glibc 2.1, __register_frame_info is defined
> > in libc and as such is supposed to be undefined in executables.
>
> Hmmm... I've not been following the details of this, but... what are you
> using to compile glibc 2.1? gcc or egcs?
I've read that Potato will replace FSF gcc with egcs. Is this still
planned? If so, shouldn't glibc 2.1 be compiled by egcs?
--
David Starner - OSU student - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
If you want a real optimist, look up Ray Bradbury. Guy's nuts.
He actually likes people. -David Brin
Reply to: