Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:40:27 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040112014026.GA11570@wonderland.linux.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040111195339.GI15281@erizo.shearer.org>
References: <[🔎] 20040111195339.GI15281@erizo.shearer.org>

On Jan 11, Dan Shearer <dan@shearer.org> wrote:

 >So what, in your opinion, are the technologies (or significant packages)
 >which should be in Debian but are not? And why do you think they are
 >not?
(Better) out of the box support for autoconfiguration of hardware like
sound cards and printers.

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [4034 se8QFhtydCdS.]

Reply to:

References:
- Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Dan Shearer <dan@shearer.org>

Prev by Date: Re: packages.debian.org lives again
Next by Date: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Previous by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Next by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread