Re: util-linux seems to have /sbin/fsck
In article <[🔎] 20040111193033.GA17753@deprecation.cyrius.com>,
Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> wrote:
>* Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
>[2004-01-11 19:18]:
>> > I think /sbin/fsck must be packed in not e2fsprogs but util-linux,
>> >
>> > How do you think about that? Is it bug?
>>
>> Sounds like a reasonable suggestion.
>
>#111651: fsck: split out from e2fsprogs?
e2fsprogs and e2fslibs together are ~ 1 MB. Isn't splitting out
fsck from that just creating packages for the sake of creating
packages ?
Mike.
Reply to: