Re: util-linux seems to have /sbin/fsck
Donggyoo Lee <donggyoo@chol.com> writes:
> Hi, I am using XFS on kernel-image-2.6.0-test11-1-386.
> I don't use EXT3, EXT2 anymore. I don't need e2fsprogs package.
> Therefore, I try to remove e2fsprogs. But, initscripts needed e2fsprogs,
> Because e2fsprogs has /sbin/fsck and /etc/init.d/checkfs.sh uses /sbin/fsck.
>
> I think /sbin/fsck must be packed in not e2fsprogs but util-linux,
> initscripts must need util-linux and util-linux must suggest e2fsprogs or xfsprogs.
> because util-linux already has /sbin/mkfs. and XFS users doesn't use e2fsprogs except of /sbin/fsck.
>
> How do you think about that? Is it bug?
Sounds like a reasonable suggestion.
Don't forget about evil reiserfs though. That would be the third one
to suggest.
> Writing in English is strange to me.
>
> Please CC to me. Why do not Debian machine send a reply for subscription to me?
> lists.debian.org hate me? Hm...
Have you tried the web interface? Waited a day? Currently there seems
to be a lot of delay in the mails.
MfG
Goswin
Reply to: