Re: "Bug marked as done" messages to-be-MIMEified?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: "Bug marked as done" messages to-be-MIMEified?
From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:06:21 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87smrgytia.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030515162155.GO14037@tennyson.netexpress.net> (Steve Langasek's message of "Thu, 15 May 2003 11:21:57 -0500")
References: <[🔎] pan.2003.05.14.11.46.45.74027@smurf.noris.de> <[🔎] 20030514132425.GE821@riva.ucam.org> <[🔎] 20030514140513.GD19891@sirena.org.uk> <[🔎] 200305150902.24602@fortytwo.ch> <[🔎] 87r870467t.fsf@cag.lcs.mit.edu> <[🔎] 20030515162155.GO14037@tennyson.netexpress.net>

Steve Langasek writes:
> I dunno, I've always found use of Outlook to be a fairly good predictor
> of bug-reporting cluelessness (use of reportbug being another :).

What's your objection to reportbug?
-- 
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Bug marked as done" messages to-be-MIMEified?
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>

References:
- "Bug marked as done" messages to-be-MIMEified?
  - From: "Matthias Urlichs" <smurf@smurf.noris.de>
- Re: "Bug marked as done" messages to-be-MIMEified?
  - From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Re: "Bug marked as done" messages to-be-MIMEified?
  - From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
- Re: "Bug marked as done" messages to-be-MIMEified?
  - From: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
- Re: "Bug marked as done" messages to-be-MIMEified?
  - From: David Z Maze <dmaze@debian.org>
- Re: "Bug marked as done" messages to-be-MIMEified?
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Kernel 2.5.69 problem
Next by Date: Re: Kernel 2.5.69 problem
Previous by thread: Re: "Bug marked as done" messages to-be-MIMEified?
Next by thread: Re: "Bug marked as done" messages to-be-MIMEified?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread