On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:24:03PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > "Pre-plans" in this case means that two people (one DD and one NM) have > been talking about it "seriously." So, if you want to shoot the idea > down, go ahead, no harm done :) And if someone else is thinking about > picking up the ball, go ahead, the pre-planners are probably willing > to join any other initiative as well. I certainly didn't intend to be part of any shoot-down, I was just wondering exactly what had been discussed, where it had been archived, and what exactly was involved in the proposal. If it's a matter of maintaining a proposed-updates-to-testing queue, and forcing uploads to that to go via a newly formed testing-security group then it doesn't seem like a lot of work to start picking volunteers. The actually patching, testing, building and uploading will be an ongoing task though. From my observer-only position it seems like the security team is usually stretched pretty thin, due to lack of members; and they have a pretty thankless task which is a shame because they do a great job. (I'm immune to this discussion on the whole; my boxes run stable at work and unstable at home). Steve --- www.steve.org.uk
Attachment:
pgpbwRyVHXudO.pgp
Description: PGP signature