Re: new locale: de-utf?
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:41:55AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:57:21PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 03:19:53AM +0200, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually it should be named just "de", since the encoding is encoded in
> > > the mo files as far as I know. (The GNOME 2.0 message catalogs are all
> > > in UTF-8, for example.)
> >
> > Olaf sent me two de.po files --- one in UTF8, and one in 8859-15.
> > What are the tradeoffs between using one charset versus the other?
>
> None, the translator uses its preferred one, and gettext converts them
> if necessary. You should ask him to send only one file, called de.po
> whichever encoding is used.
Since this thread seems to have gotten the attention of folks who would
know, could someone tell me how to deal with #180823?
--
- mdz
Reply to: