On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 07:32:09PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > this makes me think, couldnt a flavor just be some set of debconf > defaults? that way it could be burned onto a cd, and a package doesnt > need anything extra to support the flavor idea. Reread my original message; it *can't* just be this. Flavours need to be more powerful -- they at least need to interract with dselect/aptitude to allow you to only list some subset of packages, and to change the effective priorities of many of the ones that are shown. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Attachment:
pgpPAITpHulnK.pgp
Description: PGP signature