On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:57:35AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Son instead of being annoye once by a mass of bug reports, > people can be annoyed periodically at a rapid frequency as their > packages at different priorities are hit? Clearly you didn't read the remainder of the message you've quoted, or Message-ID: <[🔎] 20021011075223.GC9172@deadbeast.net>. > I fail to see how breaking up a mass bug filing artificially > in any way ameliorates any offence the mass filing may cause. Indeed, > if you think that this works, I'll merely write up a scriupt that > delays X units of time to file mass bug reports -- say, evey 6 hours > or so, some bugs shall be sent. Yes, certainly the mass filing of bogus reports demonstrates the evil of mass filing in general. > The spirit, not the letter, of the objections to mass bug > filing ought to be looked at. And where is that spirit articulated? You seem to have a handle on it, so why don't you do so? -- G. Branden Robinson | I am sorry, but what you have Debian GNU/Linux | mistaken for malicious intent is branden@debian.org | nothing more than sheer http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | incompetence! -- J. L. Rizzo II
Attachment:
pgp0jq6Ot6V6V.pgp
Description: PGP signature