Re: the netbase/inetd conspiracy
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 09:19:49AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Am I right that today (woody) disabling inetd reliably that it is not
> startet on package upgrades requires messing with /etc/init.d/inetd
> (removing or exit 0) causing unwanted questions from dpkg when the
> maintainer changes /etc/init.d/inetd, because invoke-rc.d is not used
> yet?
Adding exit 0. Removing it will cause unwanted errors during upgrades.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Reply to: