Re: gnupg-doc of standard priority?
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 12:53:22AM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Well... I would say that gnupg is dangerous in the hands of someone
> who hasn't read its documentation. It should be standard because
> gnupg should not be installed by default without its docs.
Bull. Imposing that ideal through packaging is inappropriate. Making the
documentation standard priority does not ensure that it is read, any
more than having it at another priority suggests that it is not (as the
documentation is still available on the web, or perhaps on another
system.)
--
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: