Re: gnupg-doc of standard priority?
Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 10:44:44AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > my fault entirely, gnupg-doc comes from its own source.
> >
> > There is no reason for it to be standard, file the bug (-:
>
> Well... I would say that gnupg is dangerous in the hands of someone
> who hasn't read its documentation.
>
> It should be standard because gnupg should not be installed by
> default without its docs.
That's a fallacy. Making gnupg-doc of standard priority does not
ensure that people will read it, the popularity-contest data about
gnupg-doc confirm this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: