On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 03:53:30PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > No matter, I was forgetting the we have already BTS and /devel/people
> > for example. :)
>
> Besides, you should be using spamassassin instead of trying to hide your
> email address anyways :)
Wrong approach for those with modems and pay-per-minute setups.
> For me, very little actual spam has slipped by it, and the few false
> positives it's found I don't care about anyways (like people without a
> clue posting HTML mail to the rsync list with no MX for the From:
> domain).
Spambouncer and spamassasin are great tools, and they rarely produce false
positives. But where bandwidth is limited through technical or financial
hurdles, they're not enough.
--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net> Crazy in the coconut
<Teknix> our local telco has admitted that someone "backed into a
button on a switch" and took the entire ATM network down
<netgod> hopefully now routers are designed better, so the "network
off" swtich is on the back
Attachment:
pgpO2fu7PME7R.pgp
Description: PGP signature