Re: aspell-dictionary virtual package
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 03:31:55PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:58:52 +0100
> Domenico Andreoli <cavok@filibusta.crema.unimi.it> wrote:
>
> > hi all
> >
> > after some time of work, debian starts to have a number dictionaries for
> > aspell. as #139012 reports, maybe it's time to make a virtual package
> > to ease the management of dependencies.
> >
> > i recall to have seen a procedure to ask for a virtual package...
> I recall seeing such a procedure somewhere also... but could not find
> it on debian-policy nor on developer's reference
>
it is in /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/virtual-package-names-list.txt.gz
> I am the submitter of that bug... my question is: should I suggest
> all dictionaries with an 'or' clause?
>
> something like:
>
> Suggests: aspell-da | aspell-de | aspell-en | aspell-es | aspell-fo | aspell-fr | aspell-no
>
> or this is bad?
>
it looks fine... i uploaded aspell and aspell-pt with the new
aspell-dictionary virtual package in place, so you should be better
to use "Suggests: aspell-dictionary | aspell-da | aspell-de | aspell-es | aspell-fo | aspell-fr | aspell-no"
i'm now filing bugs against other aspell dictionary packages...
bye
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
Reply to: