Re: libusb...
Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org> cum veritate scripsit:
> On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 14:21, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Also, it allows different development libraries, I believe
> > with libusb-0.1.so.4, you can link in libraries with "-lusb-0.1"
> > and it can coexist easily with "libusb-0.2" which may be sourcewise
> > very incompatible.
>
> That's kind of a different issue. To make "-lusb-0.1" work, all you
> need is some file called libusb-0.1.so. You could still use
> "libusb.so.4" as the soname; the two don't have to bear any relation at
> all to one another.
Yes.
However it would be nice to have the luxury of knowing the
development library name from the runtime library.
It also depends on how one likes/dislikes libtool...
regards,
junichi
--
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Reply to: