Colin Watson <cjw44@flatline.org.uk> wrote: > > It shouldn't be automatic. Take silo, for instance, which was orphaned > for a long time; removing that automatically would have been bad for the > sparc port. However, if you feel like using the automatic report as a > guideline for which packages we should think of removing, feel free. If silo *had* been dropped when orphaned, it would have been picked up again much quicker by someone who wanted to see the sparc port continue, if there was such a creature. If there wasn't, then what would the sparc port exist for? -- Sam Couter | Internet Engineer | http://www.topic.com.au/ sam@topic.com.au | tSA Consulting | OpenPGP key ID: DE89C75C, available on key servers OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C
Attachment:
pgpAy9g9eJ9vc.pgp
Description: PGP signature