Re: Mail-Followup-To header (was: Package Reorganisations)
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 03:09:07PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> >>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> Anthony> _Gah_. Please don't cc me on list mail!
> Sorry.
> FYI: Your mail had the header:
> Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org
> which is wrong.
It's not /that/ wrong: if you reply to -devel-announce (ie, have an
In-Reply-To: header), it'll go to -devel anyway...
(The _Gah_ for those playing along at home was because I'd already replied
privately to Brian when I realised it was a list mail. I hate MUAs...)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Reply to: