[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Standards-Version < 3.0.0 RC? (was: goals for woody ?)



Hi Sami!

You wrote:

> I think the easiest way to be sure the FHS will be implemented in every 
> package is to mass-report RC Bugs on every package that has 
> Standards-Version < 3.0.0

Well, if there is consensus on Standards-Version < 3.0.0 being RC, then
I'm willing to write a script that files the bugs. I'm not sure if there
is consensus about this point though.

-- 
Kind regards,
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bas Zoetekouw                  | Si l'on sait exactement ce   |
|--------------------------------| que l'on va faire, a quoi    |
| zoetekw@phys.uu.nl             | bon le faire?                |
|    bas@A-Es2.uu.nl             |               Pablo Picasso  |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+ 

Attachment: pgpba5i0oDmtc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: