Re: orphaning fetchmail
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 08:04:15PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 06:51:13PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > (1) Have an SSL-disabled version in main and an SSL-enabled version in
> > non-us/main
> > (2) Only have one version, SSL-enabled, in non-us/main.
> fetchmail is licensed under GPL license. What about conflict between GPL
> and BSD clauses from openssl? I mean the problem with mutt and ssl. What
> about lynx-ssl, links-ssl, fetchmail-ssl and others?
dumb question perhaps, but would it make sense to have a client
equivalent to stunnel and spare the effort of hacking SSL support
into every individual client? Or is there already a stunnel-client
I just don't know about?
Best Regards,
--Toni++
Reply to: