Re: hell
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:01:35PM +0200, Tamas SZERB wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 12:50:33PM +0200, Tamas SZERB wrote:
> > > what can be the problem?
> > >
> > > a program was compiled under libc6 2.1.3, and can run under libc6 2.1.94,
> > > but after recompile with the newer libc6 it is unable to work.
> > >
> > > Of course the cpp, g++, gcc packages changed in versions.
> > >
> > > Who is responsible for that?
> >
> > Maybe supplying the program, and *real* description of what "unable to
> > work" means would get you better results.
>
> okay, but that is my first look to the problem, i hoped that mistake
> probably was discovered by somebody.
But your problem could be one of a million things. Just saying "unable to
work" means nothing when debugging programs :)
Ben
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: hell
- From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
- Re: hell
- From: Tamas SZERB <toma@rulez.org>