Re: Inconsistent Architecture?

To: Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Inconsistent Architecture?
From: Federico Di Gregorio <fog@mixadlive.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 14:16:37 +0200
Message-id: <20001011141637.I504@mixadlive.com>
Mail-followup-to: Federico Di Gregorio <fog@mixadlive.com>, Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <87og0rd1et.fsf@matt.w80.math-hat.com>; from zukerman@math-hat.com on Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 08:10:02AM -0400
References: <87og0rd1et.fsf@matt.w80.math-hat.com>

Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Itai Zukerman's letter:
> In debian/control, the Architecture field allows either "all", "any",
> or a list of arches (from 4.2.3 in the Packaging Manual).  I'm
> wondering why the ! notation from build dependencies hasn't also been

where is the documentation for build dependencies? apparently i can't
find it anywere... :(

thanks,
federico

-- 
Federico Di Gregorio
MIXAD LIVE System Programmer                           fog@mixadlive.com
Debian GNU/Linux Developer & Italian Press Contact        fog@debian.org
             A short story: I want you. I love you. I'll miss you. -- Me

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inconsistent Architecture?
  - From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>

References:
- Inconsistent Architecture?
  - From: Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [BALLOT] Social Contract Change Amendment
Next by Date: Re: apts -> /usr/ports script
Previous by thread: Inconsistent Architecture?
Next by thread: Re: Inconsistent Architecture?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread