Re: emacs,

[Roger So <rogerso@sis.dhs.org>]

On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 09:16:43PM -0600, Anthony Fok wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 08:38:55AM +0800, zw@zhaoway.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 11:10:24AM -0400, Thomas Chan wrote:
> > > But even Unicode 3.0 does not have HKSCS's 8AE3, 8B4D, 8B4E, nor 8B4F (but
> > > it does have 8B50 as U+95AA).  I guess one can rank the "dirtyness" as:
> > > GB2312 < Big5 < {GBK, Unicode 3.0} < Big5HKSCS. :)
> > 
> > that is why computer could enhance our lives. but it surely
> > depends on the standard writers' moral consciousness.
> > so, thanks gb2312. (i won't use gbk soon, lucky :)
> 
> ¡@¡@¾ÚºÙ¡ABig5 HKSCS ­»´ä¼W¸É¦r²Å¶°¤§©Ò¥H¦³³o°ï²Ê¤f¦r¡A¬O¬°¤F
> ĵ¹î¸¨¤f¨Ñ®É¨Ï¥Î¡A¦Ó¤£¬Oµ¹¤@¯ë¥«¥Á¨Ï¥Îªº¡C¦]¬°¨S¦³¤F³o¨Ç¦r¡A
> ¸¨¤f¨Ñ®É¡A´N«D¥Î«÷­µ¤£¥i¡A¤@¨Ó³Â·Ð¡A¤G¨Ó¡uÃ㤣¹F·N¡v¡H  :-)
> ¾Ç®ÕªÖ©w¤£·|±Ð³o¨Ç¦r¡C  :-)  §Ú¥i¯à¬O©t­®¹è»D¡A§Ú¬ù²¤¬Ý¹L
> HKSCS ªº¦r«¬ÀÉ¡A´N¬O§ä¤£¥X¸Ì­±ªº²Ê¤f¦r¡C :-)

¤£ª¾§A¥Î¤F¬Æ»ò¦r«¬ÀÉ©O? §Ú¥ÎªºµØ±d¦r§Î¬O¦³ªº... :p

-- 
  Roger So                                            telnet://e-fever.org
  spacehunt at e-fever dot org                          SysOp, e-Fever BBS
  GnuPG  1024D/98FAA0AD  F2C3 4136 8FB1 7502 0C0C 01B1 0E59 37AC 98FA A0AD