Re: emacs, ??????????
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 11:10:24AM -0400, Thomas Chan wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 zw@zhaoway.com wrote:
> > 不過 GB2312 還是不夠完美,比如GB2312裡面還有 鳥 字,這個字在
> > Window 裡面還沒有給過濾掉, 不過這裡又得說說 Debian 的好了,
> > XCIN 的拼音輸入法裡面就沒有這個字.實在是好啊,以後所有用上
> > Debian 的朋友都不會說臟話了,他想說 Diao, 也隻能說 鳥.多好!
> > 不然的話,我也想 file a bug report 了, ... :)
>
> I'm not sure which "diao" you want to say--is it U+5C4C (Big5's CE78; not
> in GB2312) or HKSCS's 8B4D (not in Big5, GB2312, nor Unicode 3.0; looks
> like men2 'door' and xiao3 'little')? :)
I'm saying diao3 in xcin-2.5.1.99-pre3/cin/zh_TW.Big5/pinyin.cin
(there is only one) don't look at it if you don't wanna be offensed. :)
BTW, this character is in Chinese Dictionaries in Mainland. And used
at least in processing ancient Chinese writings. (what a pitty :( but
fortunately we could clean up 'em with the help of GB2312 now. :) and
left people all wondering what's wrong with that bird? :D
> But even Unicode 3.0 does not have HKSCS's 8AE3, 8B4D, 8B4E, nor 8B4F (but
> it does have 8B50 as U+95AA). I guess one can rank the "dirtyness" as:
> GB2312 < Big5 < {GBK, Unicode 3.0} < Big5HKSCS. :)
that is why computer could enhance our lives. but it surely
depends on the standard writers' moral consciousness.
so, thanks gb2312. (i won't use gbk soon, lucky :)
--
| This message was re-posted from debian-chinese-gb@lists.debian.org
| and converted from gb2312 to big5 by an automatic gateway.
Reply to: