[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Unbreaking partman-zfs



Quoting Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org):
> Hi,
> 
> so we've got already #720442 and #720450 against partman-zfs, breaking
> partitioning, but also that:
>   partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
>   partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
>   partman-zfs/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
>   partman-zfs/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
>   partman-zfs/armel unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
>   partman-zfs/armel unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
>   partman-zfs/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
>   partman-zfs/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
>   partman-zfs/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
>   partman-zfs/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
>   partman-zfs/mips unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
>   partman-zfs/mips unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
>   partman-zfs/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
>   partman-zfs/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
>   partman-zfs/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
>   partman-zfs/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
>   partman-zfs/s390x unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
>   partman-zfs/s390x unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
>   partman-zfs/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
>   partman-zfs/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
> 
> (Also, missing 25 and 26 tags in git, and outdated master.)
> 
> I'm very much tempted to upload partman-zfs 25 as partman-zfs 27, and
> call it a day. Broken partitioning is a very serious issue; ditto for
> depending on something that doesn't exist.


I just pushed my branches. This is really my problem with git:always
forgetting to push things back....



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: