On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:42:11PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> I fully understand. Why was this then OK for etch, but not for
> lenny? (Not wanting to start a discussion about this, just want to
> know why things have changed.)
See #383403 [1] which was not addressed properly for etch (tagged
etch-ignore) along with other non-free firmwares present in the kernel.
Lenny now finally have proper ways to deal with such issues! :)
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/383403
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio .''`.
lunar@debian.org : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'`
`-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature