Joey Hess wrote:
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:Write the changes to disks? [ ] Write the changes to disks? A simple correction for now could be to just not repeat the question: Write the changes to disks? [ ] Yes.I agree with you and this can be easily done, as cdebconf package provides debconf/button-yes and debconf/button-no templates. Does anyonne see any possible problem that could arise with the "yes/no" approach ?Why not just: [ ] Write the changes to disks?
This cold be easily implemented by not displaying the boolean question's description above it, like this
Question's extended description [ ] Question's description
Or, if you're going to use the button-* strings, why not use buttons: White the changes to disks? [yes] [no]
This is a little less clean: the general approach in the GTK frontend is delegating to [back] and [forward] buttons only returning from frontend_go().
friendly Attilio