On Friday 04 November 2005 11:49, Sven Luther wrote: > Well, i think the way the kernel .udebs should change, and have > repeated that often enough, but really didn't include any such claim Yes, exactly my point. > here. Also notice that joeyh's reply was much more reasoned and open > than any of your "let's bash sven" kind of replies, so where is the > problem ? [...] > Bah, if you want to hide yourself from reality, my other post was only > to know when would be a good time for *me* to look at the issue and not So why did you not write that? That was absolutely not clear from the first mail I replied to. Do you expect people to read your intentions between the lines or something? It would have been so much more effective if you had started a new thread saying "this issue is still open; I plan to work on this after the beta is released, here is an outline of what I plan to do". You would _never_ have gotten the negative replies from me if you'd done that. > be disruptive, as i certainly don't enjoy doing work which is then > reverted without notice with disdainful coments, or writing pacthes > which smolder in the BTS for years until they are obsoleted. Which is only likely to happen if a solution is implemented that ignores issues that were raised in the past. > I discussed this selfsame issue > with joeyh in helsinki, and he told me it would be no major problem to > do so, and be quick and easy, which is why i proposed to do this > post-beta1 when 2.6.14 will be the d-i kernel. What could be wrong with > that ? Especially as wrong as to get me your constant bashing. I really > don't get this. Nothing at all. Just that I do remember there were issues and I've never seen a proposal that deals deals with them. If you've discussed this in private with Joey in Helsinki, you can't blame me for not knowing about that, can you? I would be very interested in seeing a proposal that does deal with the issues that were raised in the past. Hope to see this proposal posted to the list soon so we can comment.
Attachment:
pgpXyYx3RkOwj.pgp
Description: PGP signature