Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > This one is to make sure our sources.list.udeb.local isn't ignored > by our CVS. Is using that file how I am supposed to add udeb > sources? Hmm, maybe things are different for Skolelinux, but we don't want sources.list.udeb.local to be added to d-i cvs, at the same time it's normal for it to exist locally. > Our CD build script expect the image to have this name. It is the > old name used by d-i, and I didn't want to spend the time modifying > our debian-cd patches. I guess we should just keep it in our tree, > and not try to modify the official d-i source. Eventually, we will > update debian-cd to use the new names, and drop this change. :) I expect the names will all change after beta 2 anyway. Hope so anyway. > The brltty-udeb was dropped, but I wanted to be reminded that it > should go back in sometime. IIRC the missing symbol is fixed now, right? What is the point of putting brltty on the regular boot CD though? > Also, the autopartkit package want to use ext3 file systems, and I > had to add the modules manually at one time to make sure that they > were available. Not sure if this is needed any more. Not needed, the priority is fixed. > I really like d-i. :) :-) -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature