fre 2002-09-13 klockan 10.18 skrev Junichi Uekawa: > > > > sure, still valid UTF-8, but it's UTF-8 for what the UTF-8 is if > > interpreted according to Latin1. I thought dpkg didn't assume anything > > at all about the encoding in control files? That it expected us-ascii > > and damn everyone who didn't follow that. Can I fix this somehow, or are > > we doomed to having several encodings in the file because we can't do > > UTF-8? > > I don't think it is a workable solution to have Description-xx fields encoding on > 8-bit encoding. > > Could we move that out of Description-xx: lines to > generate some kind of po file? Believe me, nobody would be happier than me if we used po files instead ;) I was only working with it like this because this was the current concept of translating the main menu. It wasn't used though, so I wanted to play around with it and test it a bit. Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel