Re: glibc regression on alpha with 2.34+
> On Dec 12, 2022, at 7:17 PM, Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:24:59PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> On Dec 12, 2022, at 9:27 AM, Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am not interested in supporting old Alphas without BWX anymore.
>>> I am drawing the line. Either someone steps up to support non-BWX
>>> Alpha and promptly fixes glibc or the architecture baseline is
>>> increased to include BWX (thereby fixing most of the glibc issues).
>>> Without either of those happening I give up being an Alpha porter
>>> and switch off my Alpha buildd permanently. I have many other
>>> interesting projects I could be working on!
>>
>> As a compromise, how about we fix the bug, create a final set of CD
>> images for old Alphas, then raise the baseline after having verified
>> it does not break QEMU (both -user and -system)?
>
> You fix the bug then. I'm not interested so there is no "we" in this.
Please don’t be so negative.
We should be able to have a discussion on this topic without such sentiments.
There are valid arguments for both sides, so it’s not helpful to lead a discussion like this.
Adrian
Reply to: