On Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 04:32:50PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > I believe you have violated a trust by making private e-mail public in
> > this fashion. As this only reduces my trust in you, I will address your
> > question anyway.
> spi-general is more "private" than the forum where you made that comment.
http://www.spi-inc.org/mailing_lists/general-1999/thread.html
The debian-private equivalent is stored on master, and not mirrored afaik.
(On the other hand, the above URL doesn't seem to be entirely up to date)
spi-private@lists.spi-inc.org would probably have been a more suitable
place to move this too, but even then probably only with Dale's assent
beforehand.
FWIW, I think SPI's and Debian's goals *are* essentially anarchic and
subversive, and I more or less agree with Dale's position, even if I'd
probably choose to make his points differently. YMM, of course, V.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred.
``Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking
for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.''
Attachment:
pgpqf_nr82Ewz.pgp
Description: PGP signature