Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Control: tags -1 _confirmed On Fri, 2025-03-07 at 21:07 +0000, Andrew Bower wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Thanks for the review - much appreciated! > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 09:57:20AM +0000, Phil Wyett wrote: > > Test 3 (build twice): Information > [...] > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986234 > > Yes, I tried to fix this but to no avail. > > I think the package needs attention from someone who can grok autotools! > According to the bug report this isn't RC, although clearly not ideal. > Not RC, not ideal as you say and groking would be easier if upstream formatted code. > > Test 6 (debian/watch): Information > > > > philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/calcurse-4.8.1$ uscan --dehs > > <dehs> > > <package>calcurse</package> > > <debian-uversion>4.8.1</debian-uversion> > > <debian-mangled-uversion>4.8.1</debian-mangled-uversion> > > <upstream-version>4.8.0</upstream-version> > > <upstream- > > url>https://git.calcurse.org/calcurse.git refs/tags/v4.8.0</upstream- > > url> > > <status>only older package available</status> > > </dehs> > > Upstream have clearly released 4.8.1 but for some reason haven't tagged > it, either in the above VCS or the new one they seem to use on GitHub. > It probably warrants an enquiry with upstream about how they plan to do > future releases. > > > Test 7 (licenserecon): Information > > > > d/copyright | licensecheck > > > > BSD-2-clause | FSFULLR config.rpath > > I think this is covered by policy 2.3: > > Thus, the copyright information for files in the source package which > are only part of its build process, such as autotools files, need not > be included in /usr/share/doc/PACKAGE/copyright, because those files > do not get installed into the binary package. > Indeed, I have filed the issue below to see if we can have 'licenserecon' exclude these from checking. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099786 > > Summary > > ======= > > > > Andrew, Above is some information. Will you be looking to address the > > results > > of tests 3 and 6? 7 is not really essential in an NMU. > > As a new contributor to Debian I am still calibrating what is > appropriate for an NMU! > The light touch of an NMU o QA upload is always up for debate, but you clearly have done what is required for this package to be uploaded and hopefully any issues can be handled in the near future by a willing person. > In principle I'd be happy to do more to bring this package a bit more > into shape but I don't really have time right now unfortunately. I don't > use calcurse yet myself but hope to do so soon - it looks like a nice > application. I hope it makes it into trixie. > > Thanks again, > > Andrew -- Regards Phil Donate: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part