Bug#1099781: RFS: runit/2.2.0-1 [RC] -- system-wide service supervision
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit":
* Package name : runit
Version : 2.2.0-1
Upstream contact : Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
* URL : http://smarden.org/runit/
* License : GPL-2+, BSD-3-clause, CC0-1.0, GPL-3+
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/runit
Section : admin
The source builds the following binary packages:
runit - system-wide service supervision
runit-run - service supervision (systemd and sysv integration)
getty-run - runscripts to supervise getty processes
runit-init - system-wide service supervision (as init system)
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/runit/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this
command:
dget
-x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/runit/runit_2.2.0-1.dsc
git repo (next branch):
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/runit/-/tree/next?ref_type=heads
Changes since the last upload:
runit (2.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Lorenzo Puliti ]
* New upstream version 2.2.0
- see /usr/share/doc/runit/changelog.gz
* update upstream metadata
* d/copyright: update years
* d/patches (quilt):
- drop patches merged or rejected upstream
- squash and refresh patches for runsvdir-rescan-feature
- refresh, squash and rework forced rescan test
- refresh remaining patches
- sigpwr, sigalrm patches: reset sigint in stage 1 and 3
(Closes: #1099752)
* add missing conflicts: finit-sysv, daemontools-run
* salsa CI: disable missing breaks test, it fails with
diversions
* init-switch test: try to fix apt command line, mark as flaky
(Closes: #1099717)
* bump S-V to 4.7.2, no changes required
* runit-init: mask duplicate sysv scripts
* test for pkgblock files in stage 1 and run_sysv_scripts
* test for pkgblok files in default policy (override-sysv)
* run_sysv_scripts: test services links with -L
.
[ Andrew Bower ]
* stop build output interleaving leading to blhc false positives
(Closes: #1092623)
* pass all build flags through once.
* build contrib and write options from same dh target for stable
canaries
Regards,
Lorenzo
Reply to: