[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1092829: RFS: geiser/0.31.1-1 [ITA] -- Generic Emacs/Scheme interaction mode



Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> writes:

> On Tuesday, January 21, 2025 6:03:00 PM MST Xiyue Deng wrote:
>> >> This should be fine, as the package is using GFDL-1.3 with "no Invariant
>> >> Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts."[1], which is
>> >> DFSG compliant (see "Exceptions" on the DFSGLicense Wiki[2]).
>> > 
>> > 1.  You should list this license as GFDL-NIV-1.3, with NIV standing for No
>> > Invariant Sections.  For example, see:
>> > 
>> > https://salsa.debian.org/soren/privacybrowser/-/blob/master/debian/copyright
>> > ?
>> > ref_type=heads#L17
>> 
>> Thanks for the tip!  Though I do have a small concern: in
>> `/usr/share/common-licenses' the file is name GFDL-1.3.  Is it OK to
>> reference it under a different license identifier?
>
> With many licenses that would be a problem, because the text of the licenses only provide 
> one option.  But with the GPL, there are two options, and with the GFDL there are multiple 
> options in the license text itself.  Thus, both the GPL-3 and the GPL-3+ reference the same 
> license text, which is located in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3.  The difference with 
> the short license names is that they specify which of the options in the license text are 
> used.
>
> In the case of the GFDL, the text of the license has the option to use Invariant Sections, 
> including two specific types of invariant sections name Front-Cover Texts and Back-Cover 
> Texts.  Using the short identifier of GFDL-NIV-1.3 specifies that none of these invariant 
> sections (which are DFSG-non-free) listed as options in the full text of the license are used.
>

Thank you Soren again for your clear explanations!  I've updated the
repo and the package on mentors accordingly.

> -- 
> Soren Stoutner
> soren@debian.org

-- 
Regards,
Xiyue Deng

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: