Bug#1071755: RFS: open62541/1.4.2-1 [ITP] -- open62541 (<http://open62541.org>) is an open source implementation
Soren,
Version #20 is now on mentors and also pushed to salsa.
> I am not an expert with the interactions between pristine-tar and MUT, but
> there might be someone else on Mentors who can point you in the right
> direction. However, figuring this out isn’t a requirement for me to sponsor
> the package. I am happy to use uscan and sbuild for the release.
I saw that gbp-export-orig does not recreate the original tarballs.
The files are the same.
But the original open62541_1.4.6.orig-nodeset.tar.gz from upstream has a different top-level folder than the exported one.
Both however get unpacked into the same /nodeset folder by the debian tooling.
Since you can build with uscan, that would be best.
I don't want to touch the folder structure in the upstream download.
The pristine-tar branch is now removed from salsa.
> You should consider each of the other lintian tags and either fix them or
> override them if they are false positives. For the spelling errors in the
> binary, you can fix them upstream for a future release, but we don’t need to
> wait for that to land for me to sponsor the Debian package.
Done.
> Your debian/copyright needs a section for debian/*.
Done.
> Your debian/changelog contains the following line:
Done.
> The upstream source code contains a LICENSE-CC0 file.
Done. lrc had not picked up on that.
I thought that was intentional due to CC0 being an "unlicense".
Again, all done from my side and ready for review.
--
Regards, Julius
Reply to: