[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1076655: RFS: bashbro/1.10-1 [ITP] -- Bash-based web file browser.



Adam,

It makes everything easier if the Debian packaging repository is separate from 
the upstream repository.  There are no rules on where they need to be hosted.  
However, my personal recommendation (also the recommendation of the majority 
of Debian developers) is that the Debian packaging repository be hosted on 
Salsa.  This is because there are some nice integrations with the larger 
Debian ecosystem if such is the case.

Wherever you decide to place the Debian packaging repository, the Vcs-Browser 
and Vcs-Git entries should point to the Debian packaging repository and not 
the upstream repository (this is understandably confusing to some people the 
first time they try to package for Debian).

Soren

On Friday, August 9, 2024 5:22:05 AM MST Adam Danischewski wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> 
> I imported the project to Salsa, but I found some examples online of people
> using github as the vcs, curious to if it's preferred or necessary to use
> Salsa at present?
> 
> E.g. https://github.com/Debian/dcs/blob/main/debian/control
> Vcs-Browser: https://github.com/Debian/dcs/
> Vcs-Git: https://github.com/Debian/dcs/
> 
> If it's workable that way, seems easier but if not, should I put the
> entries in debian/control like this:
> Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/adanisch/bashbro.git
> Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/adanisch/bashbro
> 
> Thanks,
>  +Ad


-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@stoutner.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: