[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1036020: marked as done (RFS: lighttpd/1.4.70-1 -- light, fast, functional web server)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2023 12:18:45 +0200
with message-id <d8a96431-a214-b5ba-1ff3-9a55636f3d10@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1036020: RFS: lighttpd/1.4.70-1 -- light, fast, functional web server
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036020,
regarding RFS: lighttpd/1.4.70-1 -- light, fast, functional web server
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1036020: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: gs-bugs.debian.org@gluelogic.com

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a DD sponsor for my package "lighttpd":

https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lighttpd/

I am an upstream lighttpd developer and have participated in
maintaining lighttpd on Debian for a number of years.

I am listed as an uploader on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/lighttpd

lighttpd-1.4.70-1 is passes autopkgtests and CI, and is tagged.
(This is not actually an NMU, but a non-DD maintainer upload.)

 * Package name     : lighttpd
   Version          : 1.4.70-1
   Upstream contact : team+lighttpd@tracker.debian.org
 * URL              : https://lighttpd.net/
 * License          : BSD-3-Clause
 * Vcs              : https://git.lighttpd.net/lighttpd/lighttpd1.4

Please help me to get lighttpd 1.4.70 into Debian Bookworm.

Thank you.  Glenn

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Sponsored by Adam Borowski.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: