[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1038136: RFS: budgie-backgrounds/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Default set of background images for the Budgie Desktop



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-backgrounds":

 * Package name     : budgie-backgrounds
   Version          : 1.0-1
   Upstream contact : Budgie Developers <admin@buddiesofbudgie.org>
 * URL              : https://github.com/buddiesofbudgie/budgie-backgrounds
 * License          : CC0-1.0
 * Vcs              :
https://github.com/ubuntubudgie/budgie-backgrounds/tree/debian
   Section          : misc

The source builds the following binary packages:

  budgie-backgrounds - Default set of background images for the Budgie Desktop

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/budgie-backgrounds/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/budgie-backgrounds/budgie-backgrounds_1.0-1.dsc

More Information:
I am the Debian Maintainer of the budgie-desktop and almost all of the
budgie-related packages contained in the archive.  I am also a team
member of the upstream budgie project github.com/buddiesofbudgie

Upstream have released a v1.0 of budgie-backgrounds.  This is intended
for all downstream projects to showcase budgie-desktop.

My future intention is to include this package as part of a wider
effort to provide Debian a first class introduction of budgie using
upstream budgie artifacts through a to-be-uploaded
"budgie-desktop-environment" in a similar way as the downstream Ubuntu
Budgie project (I am the project lead for this).  This will ensure a
consistent backgrounds, fonts, gtk style, icons etc rather than the
existing bare-bones budgie-desktop package.

Changes for the initial release:

 budgie-backgrounds (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Initial Release (Closes: #1037965)

Regards,
-- 
  David Mohammed


Reply to: